Related time notes
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:20What a working Babbage engine could change in ship designQ&A
- Historians: doomed to watch others repeat mistakes?0:00Technology changes methods, not judgmentNotable Point
- Historians: doomed to watch others repeat mistakes?1:02Why quantitative proof needs qualitative contextNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!3:31:01Naval treaty holidays concealed technological progressQ&A
- Carriers in Science Fiction: Parsite Craft as a primary means of defence & offence...0:11Science fiction as a test bed for future naval problemsNotable Point
- Patreon 83: What were the most serious mistakes made in WWII based on WWI experience?27:47Why 1939 navies could not treat carriers as provenNotable Point
- Empire Total War Twitch Stream 1(February 2023)12:04Domestic investment before imperial expansionNotable Point
- Bruships 84: Science Fiction Strikes Again57:03A fighter pilot commands Avalon by relying on shipboard specialistsNotable Point
- Bruships 84: Science Fiction Strikes Again1:01:39How replicators could change warship battle-damage repairQ&A
- Bruships 84: Science Fiction Strikes Again1:58:21Why mixed technology drives larger warshipsQ&A
- Titanic Lessons Learned 110yrs On (Long Patrol)21:19Technology needs access and common standardsNotable Point
- Bruships 69: The Decider3:02:30Fire-control computing matters at the system levelQ&A
- Bruships 27: Science Fiction Books35:01Why Discovery's perfect machinery seems unconvincingNotable Point
- Bruships 27: Science Fiction Books54:18Why obsolete ships save the day in science fictionNotable Point