Related time notes
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?50:10Different carrier prospects for France and ItalyNotable Point
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:37:50French battleship designs with quadruple turretsQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...39:43Choosing exhibits for a museum of bad warship designQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:12:33A 25-capital-ship Washington Treaty fleetQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:19:03Would a larger Royal Navy deter German surface construction?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust6:40:26Bearn's concentrated machinery and damage-control concernsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust7:47:45The better Bearn conversion France did not chooseQ&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?5:18French dreadnought design met the limits of its shipyardsChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?9:08Normandie and Lyon stretched France's investment in 340 mm gunsNotable Point
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?12:08Normandie's mixed engines complicated training and protectionNotable Point
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:09:53An Italian interwar carrier forceQ&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:04Italian and French completions reopen the treaty building holidayNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!1:50:01Normandie, Lyon, and France's unbuilt battlecruisersQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...11:17Why Béarn was a difficult carrier conversionQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat1:11:47French battlecruiser choices before 1914Q&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat2:39:24Britain's response to fifteen French capital shipsQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?2:51:08A delayed war and the Normandie classQ&A
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons9:30Béarn, treaty constraints, and a missed carrier forceChapter
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons52:16What two Béarns might have changed before the Second World WarNotable Point
- Navys in the Embassy Bar after the Washington Treaty(1922)10:00French parity frustration and the Béarn conversionNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered41:29A better propulsion scheme for the Normandie classQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time4:11:39Normandie and Lyon become Mediterranean escorts and bombardment shipsQ&A
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty57:03French redesign versus an Italian Caracciolo programmeChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:16:57Normandie, Lyon, and French design momentumChapter
- Battleships of the Treaty Era26:36What the treaty stopped each navy buildingChapter
- Bruships 116: Australia Trip Books... Continued1:49:37French capital ships needed major interwar reconstructionQ&A
- What were the 'Bearns' of the other Major Navies? RM, IJN, USN, RN & Kreigsmarine6:03Bearn's raised lifts obstructed flight operationsChapter
- Patreon 78: The Bearn of every major treaty navy...46:51Courbet and Normandie compound French battleship compromisesChapter
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:23:10French capital-ship responses to Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI? Comment Response24:48Bearn's turbines, range, and conversion economyNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?12:27Bearn and lost carrier momentumNotable Point
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?10:00Bearn as the carrier problemChapter
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?16:58Would Bearn have been better as a battleship?Q&A
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:30:25Normandie's design and the break to DunkerqueNotable Point
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:35:36Should Lyon and Normandie be judged against HMS Hood?Q&A
- Bruships 95: Science Fiction, Including Paddle 'Corn Oil' (Aka BioDiesel) Battleship Twist...2:19:58French battleships if Italy stays outside the naval treatyQ&A
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...1:11:46Why better British machinery was not a simple answer for the NormandiesQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times1:01:37French battleship ambition constrained by shipyardsQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19133:02Normandie's quadruple-turret compromiseNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191312:29Why the 1913 naval race was globalChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 5: French & German Carriers2:01Béarn as a battleship-to-carrier conversionChapter