Related time notes
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:35Adapting cruiser fire control to a battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:45:43Star Wars battle ranges and competing explanations of ECMNotable Point
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...4:33:56Why the 130,000-ton battleship design was cursedQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!2:07:35A Mark 48 needs more than a compatible torpedo tubeQ&A
- Albany Class: Comment Response19:23Why early missile cruisers need system-by-system analysisNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine eschews steam and goes all Diesel(-electric) propulsion8:34Could a warship engage several targets at once?Q&A
- British Light Cruisers & Treaties: A UAD Infused discussion16:26Volume of fire versus the perfect cruiserNotable Point
- Some Sunday Naval Books24:50Armament choices drove the Town-class design spiralNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:20:54Can 40 mm accuracy offset a 20 mm rate of fire?Q&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:23:44The Soviet quad 57 mm gun and its electronics limitQ&A
- Tribal Class in 60s (Combined)3:05Gun-heavy layout and advanced fire controlNotable Point