Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
A nine-battleship line shows how common speed, range control, and a scouting battlecruiser trap a lone opponent.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A refit comparison shows how shell weight, gun range, penetration, accuracy, and rate of fire pull a design in different directions.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A suggestion to remove the secondary tower prompts a practical answer about extra 6-inch guns, visual preference, and waiting for combat evidence before redesigning the ship.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
The campaign map shows how oil income supports shipbuilding and sustained naval competition.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
An overcommitted construction budget and a tiny crew pool show why a large empire still has to retire older hulls before expanding its useful fleet.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A force review links sonar, torpedo spotting, submarine numbers, and surface-fleet balance before the Italian fleet action.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
Recognizing a destroyer-heavy opponent prompts an immediate switch to screening orders, line ahead, and tight spacing.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A torpedo-heavy Italian force forces a rethink of destroyer escorts and rapid-firing secondary guns.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A suggestion to reduce the secondary calibre gets a direct answer about retaining the destructive margin of a 6-inch shell against destroyers.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A tempting firing angle is rejected because fleet cohesion and keeping small attackers inside secondary range matter more.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
The same battle shows why primary guns and secondary batteries should divide labor against different threats.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
A possible second Italian battleship left out of the action turns the result into a lesson about concentrating scarce heavy units.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
The loss of Russell shows that thick armor and strong torpedo defenses cannot eliminate the risk of a catastrophic magazine hit.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
The battle's aftermath converts four British losses and the destruction of the Italian force into specific escort, gun, and force-balance decisions.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
After most of the Italian fleet is destroyed, the campaign shifts from surviving its torpedo attack to planning a naval invasion of Central Italy.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
The closing caveat treats single-ship battles as ahistorical controlled tests of a design.
From Check Campaign 20: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign ·
An RAF public-health answer explains why preventing malaria protected personnel and reduced the medical burden on wartime forces.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A short Fleet Air Arm answer explains why tanker value depends on the handling and deployability of the carrying aircraft as well as fuel volume.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A technology-adoption answer makes institutional enthusiasm, not technical success alone, the key to whether advanced VTOL aircraft reshape world aviation.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A service-life answer separates the physical durability of a naval aircraft from the Treasury choices that determine whether a capability survives.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A British carrier counterfactual links TSR-2 and four CVA-01s to Falklands deterrence, global-power status, and allied carrier policy.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A midget-submarine answer separates rail mobility and local ambush value from the range, infrastructure, and ASW limits that would shape real wartime use.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A brief propulsion answer expects treaty-free navies to explore turbo-electric drive more widely while leaving actual adoption unresolved.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A CVA-01 air-group answer distinguishes a technology demonstrator from its operational descendants and keeps the carrier's conventional design central.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A force-deployment answer explains why France's large destroyers would shift from dispersed Atlantic duties to Mediterranean concentration in a Second World War-like conflict.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A fast-battleship counterfactual uses the R class to show how speed changes Jutland tactics, postwar refits, Nelson design, and treaty bargaining.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A British carrier-replacement answer uses Malta and CVA-01 to explain why nominal 20-year replacement cycles fight ship service lives and politics.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A capital-ship design answer uses a fifth turret to show how armament, speed, armor, and machinery compound displacement growth.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A French Navy planning answer lays out a balanced pre-1914 fleet of cruisers, battleships, torpedo boats, and submarines rather than a single prestige program.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A carrier-force-structure answer connects fleet size to maintenance cycles, reserve activation, and the difficulty of keeping nuclear ships in ordinary reserve.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A treaty answer explains why completed Admiral-class carriers would change the negotiating baseline rather than merely occupy space inside the historical limits.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A destroyer-tonnage answer shows how a larger treaty ceiling would blur the line between destroyers, leaders, and small light cruisers.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A submarine-design answer explains why an underwater-optimized hull was poorly matched to boats that still operated largely as surface vessels.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A long carrier-design exchange tests headline dimensions against canal draft, dry-dock support, internal hangars, and air-group politics.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A damage-control answer explains why penetrating a hull is not the same as defeating a warship's watertight integrity and pumping capacity.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A carrier-arms-race answer separates recognizing a foreign threat from securing the money and time needed to build a response.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A carrier-design answer uses HMS Eagle's hangar height to explain how treaty absence could reshape British carrier size, survivability, and air-group choices.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
An amphibious-warfare answer contrasts American specialist APDs with Britain's more improvised use of destroyers for commandos and landing operations.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A short carrier-design answer connects hangar clearance to the wider weight-and-stability calculation.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
An amphibious-warfare answer identifies landing craft and troop-carrying capacity as the vulnerable link that can collapse an invasion.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A sensor counterfactual shows how passive infrared could strengthen night reconnaissance and targeting across several early-war naval campaigns.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A war-prize answer turns an intact Tirpitz into a problem of Allied rivalry, Norwegian claims, and the practical value of owning a battleship.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A carrier-logistics answer ties routine fly-on operations to the growth of shore aviation infrastructure rather than to the carrier alone.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A cruiser-refit answer separates missions the Monmouth class could still perform from the heavy-gun fight that exposed its weakness at Coronel.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
An ASW sensor answer explains why passive infrared could displace the Leigh Light and expand into naval night-fighting sights.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A design-lineage answer tests a dramatically enlarged Orion and identifies triple turrets as the requirement capable of explaining the displacement jump.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
A dreadnought-arms-race answer distinguishes Britain's gun-caliber competition with several navies from the special political pressure of a German triple-turret challenge.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·
An auxiliary-cruiser answer explains why sustained speed and range matter more than trying to disguise a battleship as a merchant ship.
From Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack? ·