Related time notes
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:46:39Internal versus external battleship armor beltsQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War4:40:21A rough quantitative test for warship densityQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress2:21:00Redundant power and machinery in modern warshipsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress2:23:49Local armour around a warship's vital spacesNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress7:01:29What makes a fast battleship rather than a battlecruiserQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress7:49:40Armour coverage versus subdivision in capital-ship protectionQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:13Why Vanguard can be read as a fully armored battlecruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:41:59Could a battleship have light armor?Q&A
- 21st Century Battleship: What would a battleship built today need to be a battleship?55:16Automation supports damage control but cannot replace sailorsChapter
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:16How modern warships use passive protectionQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:20Why subdivision matters even when armor stops a shellQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:34:00Subdivision separates a fast battleship from a battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:00:54Battleship subdivision as a honeycombQ&A
- Just 10 Days of Submarine Sinkings29:11Where Kongō sits between battlecruiser and fast battleshipNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/45:24:13What the Edinburgh subclass improvedQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy23:36Subdivision reveals a capital ship's design balanceNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy55:50Why Renown could absorb major reconstructionQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:28:19Why G3's armor did not automatically make it a fast battleshipNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:38:01Why modern warships favor subdivision over heavy armorNotable Point
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:11:56How Illustrious-class carriers resisted underwater damageQ&A
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:31:58Why K3 remained a battlecruiserQ&A
- Luigi Cadorna Class: The Regia Marina's Condottieri Part 233:46Speed specialization came at a survivability costChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?2:54:29Why a warship is not a naval main battle tankQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:49:37Warship design lessons from the Falklands WarQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru3:04:46Could Titanic's iceberg sink a Second World War battleship?Q&A