Related time notes
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:14:33Testing a 1918 fast-battleship proposal against available machineryNotable Point
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:51Why stationary boiler performance does not transfer directly to shipsNotable Point
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...27:26Why advanced boilers needed accumulated manufacturing experienceNotable Point
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...28:42Why a power-station boiler faces different demands at seaNotable Point
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:36Why charcoal is only an emergency substitute for marine coalQ&A
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?18:22Boiler count, power, and the missing hull lengthNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?29:13Small-tube boilers and Britain's industrial baseChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?47:07Weight was a consequence, not the flawChapter
- Kaiser Wilhelm II goes full navy: Kaiserliche Marine wins the funding battle! Patreon Premier 254:24Boilers and speed margins drive the British responseNotable Point
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri37:07What limits an early 26-knot battleship's boilers?Q&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships53:20Small-tube boilers and Revenge-class speedQ&A
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain2:07:20Marine boiler research often starts with technical training manualsQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:05:00Were small-tube boilers fuel hungry?Q&A