Q&A · 2:11:36-2:13:14

Why charcoal is only an emergency substitute for marine coal

Charcoal could move a steamship when no coal remained, but poor range, power density, and boiler consequences make it unsuitable for regular service.

Question

Could charcoal replace mineral coal as fuel for ships?

Short answer

Only in an emergency over a short distance; it could raise steam, but would not provide the range, power density, or boiler performance needed for normal naval use.

Notes

Charcoal is considered a possible emergency fuel when no other option is available and the ship only needs to travel a short distance. The objection to regular use is inadequate range and useful power density. Heating wood or other organic material in a low-oxygen environment removes water and volatile constituents to produce a more consistent heating fuel. A further concern raised is sulfur and its effect on steam machinery, although no fuel analysis or boiler trial is supplied.