Related time notes
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:07:26Why Leander conversion studies began during constructionQ&A
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...49:16Type 82 was conceived as a fleet leader and presence shipChapter
- The World Naval Review 2026: A Great Key Book Series24:34MATCH and Ikara keep the ship in the attack loopChapter
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:52A late-1960s ASW conversion for the Daring classQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida9:20:22A brief comparison of Ikara and other ASW weaponsQ&A
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age39:37Ikara extended a ship's anti-submarine reachNotable Point
- Bruships 206: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:47Malafon and Ikara comparedQ&A
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)3:59:46Why could the Soviet Navy mass more RBU rockets than NATO ASROC weapons?Q&A
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain25:26A larger Type 82 could combine Sea Dart, a hangar, and IkaraQ&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers2:55:19County and Bristol performed cruiser functionsQ&A