Related time notes
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:13:38A 1927 treaty based on construction quotasChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:18:19A decade of continuous construction in improving pairsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:19:30Replacement arithmetic leaves little room for older battleshipsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:21:22Yamato’s historical design loses its intended opponentsNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:32:35New orders could remove First World War ships from primary rolesNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon43:39Industrial depth decides who can replace a lost fleetQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon7:09:20The 2025 case for keeping Type 45 in service until Type 83Q&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!1:49:24Replacing the chartered Stena ImmaculateQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:44:39When a six-ship Invincible class might finally retireQ&A
- Check Campaign 8: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:04:39Béarn's long service reflected continuing French needQ&A
- Check Campaign 7: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign18:50Mines, submarines, and replacement capacity in a global warChapter
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:16:32How DDG(X) moves from Ticonderoga replacement to Burke replacementQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:37:59Britain's argument against the building holidayQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:56:22Why the cruiser requirement was not a two-for-one replacementQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships1:43:53Why extra old cruisers do not postpone British replacementQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?1:42:51Why scrapping alone cannot sustain shipbuilding capacityQ&A
- Building the Fleets for Jutland49:19Even a British catastrophe would not create parityNotable Point
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 41:04:36Without the battleship holiday, replacement could outrank modernizationQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 42:18:05A peacetime carrier loss could unlock replacement funding during rearmamentQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)12:56Why a 42,000-ton limit need not force wholesale replacementQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)36:59A replacement calendar built around service lifeChapter
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)40:01Why treaty replacement rules use year-end datesQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)46:56Which older British battleships would be modernised?Q&A
- The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)1:22:07Replacement capacity changes the cost of naval lossesNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)1:26:22Could fleet-age limits replace the treaty construction holiday?Q&A
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…2:07:48Why Eagle and Ark Royal could not serve foreverQ&A