Related time notes
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:00:12Why the HMS Duke of Kent proposal sounds fictionalQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:07:31Why Italy studied an impractical 8-inch/96 gunQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)58:59Naval designers work on both current ships and future requirementsQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:02Project Ark Royal was an option study, not a programNotable Point
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:25:52An active carrier program preserves designs for wartime expansionQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:34:54Minimal carrier studies did not authorize constructionQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:41:10Roskill's source base leaves a gap around naval constructionNotable Point
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:44:20Contingency plans do not prove a likely warNotable Point
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:46:12Minimal carrier studies contribute to later practical designsNotable Point
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...2:46:47An impractical Hermes replacement can still train designersQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:03:38The limits of judging the unbuilt Malta classNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:18:24How many CVA-01 designs were considered?Q&A