How did Perry maintenance costs compare with those of the Arleigh Burke class?
Short answerThe Perrys were cheap to maintain when younger, but their costs rose with age; Burkes benefit from a continuous production line that keeps their support base active.
NotesPerrys were inexpensive to maintain earlier in life, though their through-life costs rose as they aged. Comparing that late-service increase directly with steadier Arleigh Burke costs misses an important difference: Burkes remained in continuous production. An active line sustains parts, skills, and support infrastructure. Production continuity therefore affects operating economics as well as new-hull prices.