Hood's refit and a continuing Lion-class programme
Probably: the refit would draw from equipment already being produced and assembled for the continuing programme.
Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Probably: the refit would draw from equipment already being produced and assembled for the continuing programme.
The preference given is for six-inch and 9.2-inch guns, based on logistics and the rates of fire attainable within different loading arrangements.
It is feasible, but fixed-wing aviation is useful enough that a larger helicopter ship can become a candidate for conversion into a light carrier.
A hypothetical group of carrier buyers illustrates how a larger production run could spread development and manufacturing costs.
Probably not: the consequences of the Franco-Prussian War would still encourage concentration on the army.
The British County class is suggested as the contemporary basis, bringing Sea Slug with it. Bristol is considered too late.
The suggested support was a strong assurance of future orders, rather than direct funding, making the initial industrial investment easier to justify.
American expansion first required more shipyards, while Britain faced coordination problems and changing priorities, with imported equipment adding delivery and installation delays.
Direct access to the water gave shipyards a ready firefighting supply during air attacks, with treatment needed afterward.
A wide assortment of artillery is recalled in British defenses, without identifying the particular twelve-inch installation.
New and enlarged yards repeatedly came into operation faster than steel production could expand to supply them.
Ordering extra material against possible shortages could make aggregate demand harder to manage across wartime producers.
A recollection of environmental reports around Portland opens a discussion of hurried steel expansion and repeated increases in demand.
A Timberborn production chain illustrates why upstream capacity and stored components need to grow before the next industrial expansion.
Moving skilled workers between carrier and corvette construction is criticized for delaying both programmes and requiring changes in working methods.
Yes: if each completed expansion immediately proved too small, fixes deferred until production caught up could be postponed again.
Urgent orders and their timing contributed to the pressure. A larger escort programme in the 1930s is proposed as a way to develop yards and steel capacity earlier.
Limited facilities and raw resources constrained Japan's expansion of steel production.
Italy is associated with insufficient construction infrastructure, while Germany faces organizational difficulties and pressure for increasingly complicated designs.
Yes, with overlapping authorities and rivalry also blamed for rewarding political success more readily than efficient production.
A criticism of status-seeking officials distinguishes displays of power from responsibility for completing work.
The difficulties identified are obtaining sufficiently accurate targeting information at long range and keeping the sensor system working outside a planet's atmosphere.
Pre-landing decisions about specialized armor draw criticism, with the conduct of American soldiers on the beaches explicitly distinguished.
Beach teams had to face the approaching landing craft and guide them ashore while the fighting continued behind them.
They were the last cruisers produced; the description of that ending as a sad whimper remains the questioner's judgment.
An account of an unnamed Royal Navy beachmaster connects extreme endurance with the continuous work of controlling a landing beach.
Drug use is rejected as the explanation, with concern about impaired judgment given as the reason for British reluctance to issue amphetamines.
A landing platform dock is suggested tentatively, but no particular ship or confirmed first is identified.
Landing craft crews repeatedly crossed the same defended shoreline to deliver fresh troops after each trip ashore.
A humorous comparison considers how troops' affection for an eccentric officer could affect their behaviour and willingness to protect him.
No definite plant is identified. The choice depends first on whether the refit would replace the machinery.
A tentatively identified British special-forces unit is recalled as asking recruits about losing a pet to assess coping with a close companion's death.
Recommissioning is judged unlikely, beginning with the difficulty of retaining useful hulls under the treaties. Rapid conversion to carry twin 14-inch turrets is entertained only as a conditional possibility.
A faster deterioration in relations with the Soviet Union, a stronger Soviet naval threat, and funding would be needed. Such a threat is also expected to revive other carrier and destroyer construction.
The fit is presented as possible but tight when the working space inside the barbette is considered. A raider-hunting rebuild would probably use six guns in three twin turrets and require substantial alterations.
The Halifax programme is judged reasonably well run, with roughly 25 years of development behind it. No precise starting date is supplied, and changes of programme name make the lineage difficult to trace.
Hans Mehl's Naval Guns: 500 Years of Ship and Coastal Artillery is recommended as an accessible starting point, with its bibliography providing a route into more detailed work.
The roles compete for flight-deck space and require different ship movements. Continuous helicopter support favours a predictable operating area, while strike aircraft benefit from a carrier manoeuvring into wind.
One proposed outcome has a capital-ship limit near 45,000 tons, larger carriers and different cruiser limits. Other participants doubt that a treaty would still be agreed at all.
Massie's Dreadnought and Castles of Steel are suggested, along with Oxford economic-history works and large historical-statistics reference books.
The figure is rejected as implausible. It is compared with roughly two Tribal-class destroyers and more than an Iowa-class main turret, but no corrected weight is supplied.
No. British designers are described as preferring the next larger gun in a twin turret for simpler maintenance, turning toward triples when useful gun size approached its practical limit.
The Royal Naval Air Service's armoured cars and accompanying boats illustrate how rescuing aircrew could create unexpected wartime formations.
Specialist branches and a yacht-and-trawler force illustrate the distinct service communities within the Royal Navy.
An unnamed Belgian town is recalled as defended by about 400 Royal Navy sailors drawn from ships' crews.
Early tanks are connected to the naval armoured forces before their entry into Army service.
An invasion becomes plausible because steam power removes dependence on wind and armour resists sailing-warship gunfire. British concentration followed by mass boarding is suggested as a costly and uncertain countermeasure.
No wider naval consequence is identified. The kidnappings and killing are connected to increased attention from security organisations.