Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Argus carries advanced medical facilities while retaining the legal and operational flexibility of an armed auxiliary rather than accepting protected hospital-ship status.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Debate over a particular successor plan does not remove the long-overdue need to replace Australia's Collins-class submarines.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A reliable T7 might serve briefly on early jets, but the greater projectile effect available at 20 mm would make eventual replacement likely.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Helicopter AEW became urgent only after the Royal Navy lost CATOBAR carriers and discovered that expected land-based warning aircraft would not always cover an expeditionary fleet.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Queen Mary's loss would remove an exceptionally valuable troop transport and cause immense political shock, although the famous near-capsize story is harder to verify than later retellings suggest.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Every major navy faced foundry limits because very thick plates were difficult to heat-treat and solidify uniformly, making additional thickness potentially less useful than designers expected.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Britain is more likely to pursue a newer tiltrotor or uncrewed AEW system than convert the ageing V-22, while a domestic supersonic STOVL fighter was technically plausible but never funded.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Early steam catapults would support heavier aircraft but might slow the rapid deck-run launches that put large Second World War strike groups into the air.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Twelve deployed uncrewed craft could require roughly one hundred or more dedicated maintainers plus spare boats, workshops, specialists, and a separate crew for the tender itself.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Direct access to HMAS Vampire's boiler room lets historians and museum specialists reconstruct machinery relationships that drawings and labels alone cannot settle.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British production reflects tier-one investment, specialized Rolls-Royce expertise, and a deliberate coalition programme rather than an American inability to build a fighter domestically.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Canadian Type 26 derivative's launch-cell architecture is comparatively stable, while its eventual missile load can evolve through partnerships over a decades-long programme.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Hospital ships and troopships are often reduced to background numbers even though they sustain campaigns and move the people on whom maritime strategy depends.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Historic names should reinforce service identity, with Tribal-class traditions and names such as Warspite carrying more meaning than bureaucratic or personality-driven choices.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Naming a major warship for a living political figure ties the vessel to unfinished controversies that historical distance would normally soften.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Grant's wartime skill at fighting and logistics did not translate automatically into the political management needed to control Reconstruction-era administration and corruption.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Norwegian order could create opportunities for shared weapons, but it does not yet prove that British Type 26 frigates will receive sixteen Naval Strike Missiles.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Many engines were removed or salvaged, but scattered wreck sites could still conceal machinery where boats were abandoned and buried by sand.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Sixteen guns create a very large target without solving range, protection, fire-control, and tactical requirements.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Britain divided maritime policing, rescue, customs, and naval duties among several institutions instead of consolidating them in one armed service.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A newly decommissioned Warspite appearing today would be preserved as a museum, with her fame making renewed scrapping politically and culturally implausible.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British yards produced designs tailored to foreign customers as well as adaptations of Royal Navy practice.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Replacing every German battleship with a fuel- and ammunition-unlimited Bismarck would create a technological and numerical shock that the Grand Fleet could answer only by risking nearly every available asset.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Unicorn would give a future aviation-support vessel a memorable name with a direct historical connection to aircraft maintenance and carrier support.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Warspite would be a celebrated name for a Type 83 destroyer, but discussion of names should not obscure that the programme had not yet produced a ship.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Modern fuzing and guidance could make a 15-inch shell more accurate, extend its useful range, and restore heavy naval gunfire as a precision support option.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Crews from a coal-burning fleet would need months to master Bismarck's much later machinery even when the scenario grants unlimited fuel and spare parts.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Beyond experimental aircraft such as the P-47 and C-130, carrier crews used purpose-built test vehicles and sometimes expendable cars to prove catapult equipment.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Hood remains an honourable and famous name, but its association with catastrophic loss makes reuse unlikely unless a much larger Royal Navy again needs many capital-ship names.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The German ships would quickly discover that modern sensors, aircraft, submarines, and missiles leave them badly outclassed, after which politics and crew loyalties would matter more than a gunnery duel.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
If both German ships vanished after Hood's loss, wartime memory might credit Hood with destroying them until their modern reappearance overturned the story.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
License-building Catalinas in Christchurch from 1939 would expand New Zealand and wider Commonwealth patrol capacity before the Pacific War and could give Force Z better information about Japanese movements.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Most 1939 ships would be militarily obsolete, but a new Ark Royal might offer modernization possibilities and the crews and dependants would create a profound social and political event.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Stability, cruiser design, dual-purpose secondary batteries, and armour development show how one early technical decision can constrain an entire class.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Four near-30-knot battleships with eight 18-inch guns each would dominate the European theatre, while their existence would probably provoke rival construction responses.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A stripped C-130 could use its own short-field performance on a carrier deck, proving an emergency long-range delivery option without making routine operations sensible.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Replacing Alaska's 12-inch battery with 9.2- or 10-inch guns could free enough weight and internal volume for better underwater protection, though designers might spend the saving on another turret instead.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A surviving Hood would generate an enormous heritage and tourism coalition, making scrapping politically implausible.
From Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Walter Pollock's written contribution combines X-lighter specifications with his claim to have designed the original powered landing craft.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
The First World War X-lighter, or Black Beetle, established a powered bow-ramp ship-to-shore capability but was better suited to reinforcement than a contested assault.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
Interwar landing-craft development was slowed by disagreement over whether the Army or Royal Navy should define requirements and pay for the boats.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
Britain could have built landing craft and amphibious auxiliaries outside naval-treaty limits, but the Ten Year Rule and tight budgets kept construction experimental and sparse.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
Sloops within the stated speed, displacement, and armament limits could be built in unrestricted numbers, making funding a separate question from treaty ceilings.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
Interwar design work preserved lessons from Gallipoli and plans for amphibious ships, but Britain built neither a large landing-craft inventory nor the parent ships needed to operate one.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
Interwar exercises turned lessons from Gallipoli into practical tests of landing-craft speed, seakeeping, and the compromises imposed by a flat ramp bow.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
Britain's small interwar MLC series used waterjets to reduce the risk of beach damage, but the choice carried a serious speed penalty compared with propeller propulsion.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
At the outbreak of war, six Motor Landing Craft were based in Britain and three at Malta, dividing the nine-craft force between home waters and the Mediterranean.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·
The tiny prewar MLC force carried troops in Norway and at Dunkirk and suffered severe losses. Only one of nine craft is said to have remained after Operation Dynamo, although the stated loss totals do not fully reconcile with that figure.
From Genesis of the Stomach Churners: Motor Landing Craft & Landing Craft Mechanised... ·