Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
A walk over Culp's Hill shows why map-based arguments for Ewell's attack miss hidden obstacles, fading light, and Union cover.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A comment contrasts the Union's experienced NCOs and quartermasters with the expense and spectacle of Zouave uniforms.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A question about Hannibal's elephants separates the success of the Alpine movement from the strategic gamble behind invading Italy.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A comparison with First Bull Run becomes a sharp criticism of McClellan's piecemeal deployment despite superior numbers and Lee's lost order.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A brief comparison links Confederate and Japanese hopes for a quick political settlement to failures of reciprocal historical understanding.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A Maginot Line comparison becomes a concise explanation of how a carrier group can make a large maritime area dangerous to cross.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The France 1940 discussion shows how a successful fixed barrier could be undermined by alliance changes, delayed deployment, and weak coverage elsewhere.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A question about prewar aid to Poland separates the moral value of a guarantee from the physical ability to deliver military help.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A wargaming question leads to a map-based critique of strongpoints, weak sectors, and the need for overlapping defensive depth toward the Meuse.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The fall of France is tied to dispersed aircraft, weak communications, poor coordination, and the gap between possessing doctrine and implementing it.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A question linking past schemes to viruses, space weapons, hypersonics, drones, and AI gets a cautious answer about maturity and targeting.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The later Maginot debate distinguishes static garrison manpower from a usable mobile reserve and asks whether French industry could really trade fortifications for armour.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A technical exchange explains how sparse roads, widening work, breakdown bypasses, and small defensive stands shaped the German advance through the Ardennes.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A comment points beyond 1940 to fortifications in Vichy Madagascar and the later reuse of Maginot works during Operation Nordwind.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A revisionism comment raises French violence and racial policy in Haiti, while the answer distinguishes omission by scope from moral approval.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The comment thread separates failed French Revolutionary landings in Wales and Ireland from the Norse-descended Norman conquest of 1066.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A Napoleonic economic-warfare question explains why Britain's trade network and widespread smuggling blunted the Continental System.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The turret-fighter discussion turns to the turretless Defiant P.94 and why it might have mattered for 1941 Fleet Air Arm fighter needs.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A counterfactual comparison asks whether a navalized P.94 could have offered the Fleet Air Arm a smaller, faster alternative to the Fulmar.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A follow-up on turret fighters explains why straight-and-level firing could help against bombers at night but failed against day fighters.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A question about whether battlecruisers belong with failed schemes gets an answer that roots them in armored-cruiser development.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The cruiser-submarine discussion begins with reload capacity, diving time, endurance, aircraft handling, and the compromises imposed by a very large hull.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A radar-guided gunnery proposal runs into antenna height, sea state, emissions, and the unstable firing platform of a surfaced submarine.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The exchange explains why deck guns became weapons for isolated merchant targets rather than the principal armament of wartime submarines.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A rate-of-fire comparison shows why two eight-inch guns did not give Surcouf a dependable advantage over a closing destroyer escort.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The discussion widens from one escort to the destroyers, cruisers, and occasional capital ships that could protect a convoy.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A compact design question considers using smaller torpedoes and adapters to carry more shots for lesser targets.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The cruiser-submarine argument ends by showing how aircraft, escort groups, and carrier construction made surface raiding steadily less viable.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A brief follow-up identifies nuclear guided-missile submarines as the closest modern analogue to the interwar cruiser-submarine idea.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A proposal to shield the gun crew from armed merchants runs into the vulnerability of the pressure hull and the weight of meaningful armor.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A proposal for submarines firing over the horizon at land targets is checked against spotting, efficiency, pressure-hull vulnerability, and sea motion.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
Hampton Roads, Mobile Bay, Savannah, and the Mississippi show why ramming successes did not displace big guns and balanced ship design.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A challenge based on the Victoria-Camperdown collision separates deliberate combat ramming from a fatal fleet maneuver executed under an admiral's order.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
The closing exchange separates a useful reinforced bow or emergency ramming tactic from warships designed around collision as their principal armament.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions... ·
A comment about German orders to avoid British cruisers opens a useful explanation of what German raiders could and could not fight.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A Norway question turns into a rebuttal of the idea that the 1940 campaign was inevitably lost once Germany moved.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A question about Scandinavian archives and political guarantees contrasts Churchill's reputation with Chamberlain's in the months before the Norway campaign.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A long Scandinavian strategy exchange links Norway, Swedish iron ore, North Sea control, and the limits on German freedom of action.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
The June 1940 seizure of four Swedish destroyers shows how tactical imbalance and political risk could pull neutral shipping into a near-crisis.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A compact counterfactual asks whether O'Connor could have finished the Italian army before Rommel arrived and whether Germany would still have entered Greece.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A challenge to British credibility after Poland draws a sharp geographic distinction between an unreachable continental ally and maritime access to Norway.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A claim that only the United States or Soviet Union could defeat Germany prompts an argument about British industry, sea power, and imperial resources.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A Denmark question explains how temporary denial of airfields could disrupt German operations against Norway, while also exposing the force needed to defend Denmark itself.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
An alternate Force Z air group combines Albacore strike aircraft with Fulmars and Sea Hurricanes for reconnaissance and fleet defense.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A procurement exchange separates the defensible pause in battleship work from a carrier pause that ran against Royal Navy doctrine and industrial reality.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A carrier-doctrine answer explains why larger converted battlecruiser carriers might have changed command arrangements and operating behavior.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A theory that HMS Glorious was detached for Operation Paul is tested against the archival evidence, strategic timing, and likely value of the proposed minefield.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·
A review of Ark Royal, Courageous, and Glorious argues that better doctrine and uninterrupted construction could have put one or two carriers beside Force Z.
From Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWII) – The Comment Questions ·