Related time notes
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:00:38An intact fleet breaks the historical 5:5:3 ratioChapter
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?1:11:18A different London naval treaty in 1925Chapter
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:33Why HMS Unicorn counted as an aviation support shipQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:58:36An Admiral-class carrier conversion could displace 37,000 to 40,000 tonsQ&A
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/202416:56How Admiral-class carriers would reshape treaty tonnageNotable Point
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/202418:08Following other navies' reactions to one changed programChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō12:16The treaty loophole behind small carriersChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō15:14Why the Royal Navy rejected very small carriersNotable Point
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō31:12A more viable forward aviation shipNotable Point
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat1:04:07A Soviet allocation in the 1930s naval treatiesQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 817:35Shell weight and the limits of manual loadingQ&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:16:21Treaty tonnage made 14-inch quadruple turrets attractiveNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:54:29How Caracciolo could alter British carrier conversionsNotable Point
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:15:13Treaty tonnage and the fast-task-force gapChapter
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:39:57Could France pair Dunkerques and carriers?Q&A
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)12:00The London Treaty's destroyer rulesChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)15:41Category transfers complicated treaty complianceNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)18:13Japanese destroyers and treaty incentivesNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)26:28Historical ceilings produced small destroyer fleetsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)29:34A 10:10:7:4:4 destroyer settlementChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)42:11Make the flotilla the treaty unitChapter
- Equitable London Naval Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD infusion (Long Patrol)35:29The Royal Navy fell far below its treaty tonnageChapter
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)13:34The economy case versus lost fighting powerChapter
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)35:48A two-ship order defeated the quantity argumentNotable Point
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:20:35Why compare official treaty tonnages?Q&A
- Patron 49: Admiral Kimmel: A Failure of Leadership? (Live)1:27:29Did Britain and America share treaty definitions?Q&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 1 - where did they come from22:12Standard displacement excluded fuel and reserve waterChapter
- Bruships30: Nine Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects(Including 1939) & Three New Books2:16:41Treaty definitions, carrier tonnage, and experimental replacementChapter