Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:47:23Town cruisers and Renown imagined with modern weaponsQ&A
- Guadalcanal, HMS Africa, Spy Ships, Metacentric Height & Cruiser build Ticonderoga: 5 in 1 Live3:27:06The Type 94 radar picket trades crew risk for data riskQ&A
- Guadalcanal, HMS Africa, Spy Ships, Metacentric Height & Cruiser build Ticonderoga: 5 in 1 Live3:31:46Why Crows Nest cannot replace a ship's targeting radarQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live56:40Possible radar fits for the future CCVQ&A
- Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class37:57Why warship missions matter more than Top Trumps rankingsNotable Point
- Trials and Tribulations: Why Testing Warships Matters...38:37Type 45 shore integration facilitiesChapter
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:25Could an international StanFlex standard have changed LCS?Q&A
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?25:52PAMS cooperation split over SAMPSON and EMPAR radar fitsChapter
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?42:01Mark 41 options and the SAMPSON advantageNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 16: Logistics15:42Why crossing missiles complicate convoy air defenseNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust11:41:22SPY-1D, Sampson, and SPY-6 radar tradeoffsQ&A
- Maya Class: The Ultimate Arleigh Burke Flight IIA or something else?47:32Could Britain and Japan share a future large destroyer?Chapter
- So you want to Build a Battleship today? For the 21st Century? Naval History Live2:07:08Keep sensors away from the guns and distribute them across dronesChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:32:29Why the Horizon partnership splitChapter