Related time notes
- Cruiser-borne aviation of the major navies; aspirations, doctrine & realities of this capability2:33:00Could the Saunders-Roe jet fighter have gone to sea?Q&A
- Cruiser-borne aviation of the major navies; aspirations, doctrine & realities of this capability2:34:00Why no clear 'best unused floatplane' stands outQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends30:18A four-ship Audacious-class carrier fleetQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered42:30Forrestal-class carriers as a Royal Navy alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered1:47:21Late-1940s carrier anti-ship attack doctrineQ&A
- Patreon 89: Everything a Scharnhorst - Germany standardises on one hull for Capital ships & Carriers3:05:49Could Ark Royal receive the first angled deck conversion?Q&A
- CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 43:09Replacing Britain’s postwar carrier forceChapter
- An Introduction to "Flying Boats & Seaplanes; Mothered by Capability or Necessity?" P3/4 WWII (Q)5:56The postwar appeal of water-based fightersNotable Point