Q&A · 42:30-43:28

Forrestal-class carriers as a Royal Navy alternative

Two or preferably three Forrestal-type carriers could have offered more capable postwar aviation than repeated upgrades to older British hulls.

Question

Would the Royal Navy have been better off selling older carriers and buying Forrestal-class ships in the 1950s?

Short answer

Probably, although a viable force would need at least three ships and the political case for that expenditure would be difficult.

Notes

Completing the Malta-class ships and acquiring large modern carriers had more merit than pouring money into older conversions. Forrestal-type ships would provide far more growth margin for postwar aircraft than repeatedly altered wartime hulls. Two carriers would still leave the force brittle whenever one entered refit. The chief obstacle would have been persuading the government to fund at least three ships for a sustainable cycle.