Related time notes
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:39:45A faster twelve-gun Nelson classQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:48:46How machinery layout could make high-pressure steam reliableQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:13:04Why high-pressure boilers would not refit the whole Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:13How 850 psi machinery would change the Nelson designQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:24:28The Royal Navy's postwar shift from high-pressure steamQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:54:42Why HMS Acheron's high-pressure steam trial did not spreadQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:03:03An 800-psi machinery plant for a Nelson successorQ&A
- The Red Fleet Project Teaser: Discussing Graf Zepplinski with Fleet of Oceans1:09:45How could the Soviets keep Graf Zeppelin's machinery running?Q&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:32:21Three changes that would make interwar British cruisers formidableQ&A
- Steam Engines: Part 1 Aeolipile to Cross Beam13:56Trevithick, Sims, and high-pressure steamChapter
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:06:02Why Britain retained familiar steam machineryQ&A
- Bruships 26 - The Random Collection25:03LMS Fury and experimental high-pressure steamNotable Point