Related time notes
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:12:05Estimating a 21-inch shell's explosive loadQ&A
- Why do Naval Historians not still use the Age of Sail Rating system?0:36Why modern gun totals became misleadingNotable Point
- Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...1:00:59What a 16-inch shell adds to shore bombardmentNotable Point
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...3:55:55A Flower-class corvette at Trafalgar is limited by ammunitionQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!3:10:01Estimating the weight of 20-inch naval shellsQ&A
- Check Campaign 16: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:54:56Range control beats nominal calibre - until a magazine explodesChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History59:55Combat reliability and shell selection set the hard problemsChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:26:29Why a turret cannot switch shell types instantlyNotable Point
- The Royal Navys Response to a 1906 Dante Alighieri1:16:22Six-inch secondaries decide the simulated actionChapter
- Bruships 130: Battleships2:28:08Selecting ammunition in a capital-ship autoloaderQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:12:06Modern naval weapons against Age of Sail fleetsQ&A
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:18:37Shell choice changes the ammunition problemNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?43:44Goeben's pursuit turns on coal, speed, and force weightNotable Point
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:54:07Could a smaller-gun ship strip defenses with high explosive first?Q&A
- Escort Carriers, the idea, designs, development and some notable operations1:15:47Taffy 3 fights surface ships off SamarChapter
- My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)1:08:45Why high explosive can outperform armour-piercing shellsNotable Point
- Bruships 61 - Ship Design; Sci-fi, Wooden & Steel, and some Naval History Questions2:33:53Proximity-fuzed shells mainly threaten exposed systemsQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers2:30:07What six-inch shells did Crown Colony cruisers carry?Q&A
- Bruships 34: Random History30:07Could a Clemson-class destroyer sink a wooden first rate?Q&A
- Bruships 34: Random History32:10Could USS Gearing defeat HMS Victory without torpedoes?Q&A
- The Great White Fleet1:51:30Choosing high-explosive or armour-piercing shells against raidersQ&A
- Battle of The River Plate - A River Plate 80 Video11:05Long-range fire control exposes technical and ammunition limitsNotable Point