Related time notes
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:09:47A brief assessment of the Fieseler Fi 167Q&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:09German battleship-carrier pairs before World War IIQ&A
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 87:10The capable Fi 167 remained a low-priority designChapter
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 823:41Graf Zeppelin's 1940 Norway strike would have lacked viable weaponsNotable Point
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 827:10Weak weapons stripped the Fi 167 and Ju 87C of viable rolesChapter
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 833:31Graf Zeppelin's planned air group reveals the procurement failureNotable Point
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response1:00:19Did the Fi 167 need Graf Zeppelin's catapult?Q&A
- What Happens if 1930s Germany Standardises on the Scharnhorst hull for Capital Ships & Carriers?31:45A Japanese-inspired German fleet carrierChapter
- Patreon 89: Everything a Scharnhorst - Germany standardises on one hull for Capital ships & Carriers2:32:00Fi 167 speed does not guarantee air superiorityNotable Point
- Graf Zeppelin: Likely British Response (Key Ships Series 2, Ship 1 Bonus)15:05Fi 167 payloads and assisted take-offNotable Point
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?2:47:52Fi 167 and Germany's unrealized carrier air groupNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 5: French & German Carriers36:23Graf Zeppelin's scale and changing air groupNotable Point