Related time notes
- Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:37What replacing Beatty before Jutland could changeQ&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:52Henderson, Fisher and the discussion of Admiral King's roleQ&A
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...3:50:38British warnings about the Mark 14 torpedoQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:27:55Changing the Bureau of Ordnance's leadership cultureQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:06Why BuOrd denied the Mark 13 and Mark 14 failuresQ&A
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:34:24Why independent allied torpedo tests were harder to dismissQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War7:19:59The Mark 14 torpedo's testing failureQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust1:12:26The logistics benefit of standardizing on five-inch ammunitionQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:57:15How reliable Mark 14 torpedoes could shorten the Pacific WarQ&A
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:53How the Bureau of Ordnance could have sabotaged the US war effortQ&A
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:03:02An Army troubleshooter fixes the Mark 14 torpedoQ&A
- Admiral Richardson: The USN's Japan War Seer & First Casualty of Roosevelts Hawaii Gambit29:40Broadening command and staff experienceChapter
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:18:15Judging admirals beyond their worst decisionsQ&A
- Pom-Pom or Bofors: Which 40mm do you want?32:42The U.S. Navy reaches the Bofors after the 1.1-inch gunNotable Point
- The Battle Line Sallied Forth: the USN Pacific Fleet goes to sea on the 6th of December 194143:33Three institutional pressures on US fleet readinessNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!3:44:42Who gets the blame for the Mark 14 torpedo?Q&A
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...1:46:50Why Britain could still evaluate the Mark 6 exploderQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!28:10Could an early carrier race improve US torpedo testing?Q&A
- USN Squadron Organisation: The Bureau of Aeronautics had Issues0:40Why US Navy squadron lineage became so difficultChapter
- Douglas TBD Devastator: Not So Bad as History Says - Key Aircraft Series 1, Aircraft 625:55Useful TBD performance was compromised by the Mark 13Chapter
- Douglas TBD Devastator: Not So Bad as History Says - Key Aircraft Series 1, Aircraft 644:23Mark 13 defects persisted beyond the TBD's serviceChapter
- Douglas TBD Devastator: Not So Bad as History Says - Key Aircraft Series 1, Aircraft 658:25Blaming the TBD obscured Midway's systemic failuresNotable Point
- Lexington & Saratoga Carrier Conception: Key Ship Series 3, Ships 10 &1120:04Bureau politics kept heavy guns on the carriersNotable Point
- Tillman's Maximum Battleships: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 826:49Tillman IV pushes the Bureau of Ordnance toward 18-inch gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword1:35:50Testing and institutional honesty separated torpedo programmesQ&A
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 194033:25Test the Mark 14 torpedo before America enters the warNotable Point
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 230:39Other navies' Bureau of Ordnance failuresQ&A
- Battle Cruiser Squadron Action: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)36:33Torpedo doctrine reveals a fleet's purposeChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 4: Naval Aviation Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A3:36:37A reliable Mark 14 would improve rather than transform the early Pacific warQ&A