Q&A · 1:14:46-1:16:00

Why waiting for small-tube boilers carried strategic and industrial costs

Waiting for better boilers would sacrifice construction time without guaranteeing that the machinery would be ready.

Question

Why not delay the Queen Elizabeth programme for a year to give small-tube boilers more time?

Short answer

An extra year offered no guarantee of suitable boilers and would sacrifice yard time while delaying ships that might be needed for war.

Notes

Waiting a year might allow small-tube boilers to mature, but it offered no guarantee that suitable machinery would be available. Idle yards depended on continuing orders and could face commercial failure. Britain would also lose a year of possible construction. Ships held at the design stage would be less likely to enter service before a war, which weighed against waiting for the ideal machinery.