Q&A · 3:14:27-3:17:22

Why Britain cannot trade land procurement for naval procurement

An either-or procurement question prompts a warning about delaying choices across all three services.

Question

Should Britain stop land-vehicle development and concentrate resources on naval programs?

Short answer

No. Britain needs both; the more damaging problem is repeated failure to make and sustain procurement decisions.

Notes

The answer rejects abandoning land-vehicle development because Britain needs both land and naval capabilities. At the time of the discussion, the prolonged Defence Investment Plan is also blamed for delaying GCAP, the combat-aircraft program. Repeated announcements about replacing the Land Rover fleet provide a concrete example of decisions that fail to produce equipment. The panel disagrees over how many replacement announcements there have been, but agrees that the vehicles repeatedly remain in service. Buying a suitable existing commercial vehicle is raised as an alternative to another elaborate program. The closing argument treats indecision as an operational danger, since a force that waits for orders can lose its opportunity to act.