Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
It should secure the new internal sea route, build carriers and cruisers, and turn the Mediterranean into a dependable logistics corridor toward the Middle East and East Africa.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The comparison with Crete questions whether Italy could capture Malta without losing much of the force needed for later operations.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The aircraft could add useful capability, but Egypt would have to change its training, maintenance, and supply system while Chinese missile factories are also described as heavily committed.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The colonies could be far more developed by the 1940s, but the policy would require centuries of sustained building, investment, and credit.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The 1861 ironclad Terribile is the earliest candidate selected, based on her commission date and place among the first Italian ironclads.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The recipient would need Baltic access and a workable transfer of command, then face intense British diplomacy rather than an immediate new war.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Seizing control would require isolating the carrier and preventing resistance or scuttling; bringing the ageing ship home would remain difficult, with disposal or museum preservation among the suggested outcomes.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British and Commonwealth resources are judged sufficient to sustain the war, with a longer buildup for returning to Europe and a less dominant US military and political position afterward.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The experience of prisoners of war created a powerful public memory of mistreatment, sharpened by the sense that a former ally had betrayed earlier trust.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
It depends on how victory is achieved: prolonged conventional war could exhaust Britain, while ending the war as the sole atomic power would produce a very different position.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Canada is judged likely to become a deciding maritime power in NATO and to gain international appreciation.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Berlin is considered likely if Hitler remains there, with the delivery aircraft possibly concealed within a mass conventional raid.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A specially adapted Lancaster derivative with more powerful engines, a parachute-retarded weapon, or a jet-powered bomber are suggested possibilities.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The largest concept is recalled as nuclear-powered, with about three catapults and a size not far short of the Ford class; early options for the current carrier programme were about 30 to 40 metres longer than the ships built.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The historical tonnage bargain becomes an ethical and legal crisis because scrapping a ship may mean killing or coercing a person.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The distinction drawn at Forrestal combines catapults, aircraft size, aviation space, and air-group capacity; Ark Royal's dimensions alone do not establish the category.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Hood remains afloat but battered; the extent of her damage and repair time remain unspecified.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A failed German landing in Norway or reliable French tactical radios could change the 1940 campaigns before later events become fixed.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A third-rate ship of the line with deliberately anachronistic paddle-wheel propulsion offers the most room for experimentation.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Middle East could begin the postwar era from a less disjointed settlement, while later conflict remains possible.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Time favours the United States because Essex-class production is accelerating, so delay sacrifices Japan's brief chance to fight before American carrier strength expands.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Britain would probably remain a major power with a larger navy, while its size, costs, and other states still prevent permanent uncontested hegemony.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Probably not. The hull was designed for about 28 knots, so a machinery swap alone would not make it a 30-knot ship.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Rapid decolonization could expose colonial institutions that concentrated coercive power, while dominion status and Commonwealth ties offered earlier attempts to reduce imperial costs through shared government and trade.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
She would remain a powerful ship because of her numerous 5-inch guns and would become an early priority for replacement of the weaker light anti-aircraft battery.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Land-based air power gains a major advantage, while navies exploit the unstable definition of spotting aircraft and build hybrid battlecarriers or armed scouts around treaty loopholes.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Early engagements become much more dangerous for Allied ships and aircraft, but the Axis still lacks the industrial base and fleet numbers to preserve the advantage through a long war.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The upgrade could have improved close defence and been useful in the Falklands, although its value and export prospects would still trail the more capable lightweight Sea Wolf.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The estimate of roughly ninety replacement Iowas depends on counting older retained ships and ships under construction at the chosen point in 1914.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British exercises are described as reinforcing a mixed force model in which uncrewed vessels work with crewed warships.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Deep subdivision, torpedo bulges, redundant longitudinal strength, and buoyant filling can limit flooding, though a close blast may still break the ship's back.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The choice is James II and VII because he commanded a fleet and won a naval battle before becoming king. The name is also intended to provoke because of his deposition and religious controversy.
From Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Moving the Alaska class into the 1936 programme requires the treaty system to fail early, while the scenario keeps the path toward Coral Sea and Midway broadly intact.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
German, Japanese, and British large-cruiser possibilities help explain why the United States could see a fast, heavy scouting ship as a credible requirement.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
A large cruiser can stand between a carrier and a stronger surface force, buying time without committing one of the fleet's most valuable capital ships.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
The classification argument places Alaska's 12-inch guns below the 14-inch or larger weapons generally expected of contemporary capital ships.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
Ordered in 1940 and laid down from 1941, Alaska and Guam entered service in 1944, after the early-war conditions that had made the design distinctive.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
Changing usage of the words battle cruiser and battlecruiser helps explain why Alaska attracts conflicting labels despite its cruiser-scale armament and internal design.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
Nine 12-inch guns, twelve 5-inch/38 guns, numerous light anti-aircraft weapons, and floatplanes made the Alaska class a heavily armed cruiser for reconnaissance and carrier protection.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
Alaska's smaller displacement did not deliver a proportionately low price: her 12-inch guns, turrets, ammunition, and small production run kept costs close to an Iowa's.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
A new ship type adds production and support burdens; it earns its place when its capabilities justify those costs.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
By the time Alaska and Guam completed, many carriers, heavy cruisers, and fast battleships were already available, leaving the class with less of the gap-filling role envisioned before the war.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
The recurring question about carrier size turns on cumulative tonnage: a 27,000-ton design could combine armour and a large hangar, but a fleet also needed enough separate carriers.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
The cruiser critique traces the 10,000-ton ceiling to Hawkins and asks whether a 15,000-ton category would have left a more useful gap below capital ships.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
Breaking free of treaty limits in the mid-1930s could bring Alaskas forward with the North Carolina and South Dakota classes, but yards, armour plants, and gun production would still limit the pace.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
The American battleship commissioning sequence shows why a ship could enter service before a major battle and still be unavailable to fight.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
An American decision to leave the treaty system invites reactions, yet existing shipyard capacity and competing army, air-force, carrier, and battleship priorities limit what other powers can actually alter.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·
An early treaty collapse could replace the 14-inch King George V programme with larger battleships and bring forward a fast ship using existing 15-inch guns.
From America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class ·