Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Small-shell effect and unavailable fire-control technology limit the value of mechanically improving the 1.1-inch Chicago Piano.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Different surrendered U-boats went to Allied powers for study, disposal or eventual preservation.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
One bomber getting through can destroy a city, making interception of an atomic attack much harder to guarantee.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Reliability alone would leave the 1.1-inch weapon competing with Oerlikon in effect while carrying the size and weight of a Bofors installation.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Different rates of change in apparent target size and tracer brightness complicate aiming, while visible incoming fire can still unsettle a pilot.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Ten fast, fresh-hulled, radar-equipped 15-inch battleships transform British deployments in the Atlantic and Mediterranean.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A rapid-firing 15-inch battery depends on reliable feeding, an enormous operating mechanism and metallurgy able to withstand the heat.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Extreme seas prevent useful fire-control solutions and force both sides to prioritize survival and post-storm positioning.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Higher-thrust Speys invite a supersonic Buccaneer redesign, followed by a debate over transonic development and a possible Phantom replacement.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Dozens of ASW escorts and small carriers make the American submarine campaign harder but cannot cover Japan's entire maritime economy.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A quicker success could allow further progress in the 1719 campaign, though the assault is identified tentatively.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A 1962 alliance supports British presence east of Suez, Japanese regional integration, and closer industrial ties.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A revived Anglo-Japanese alliance need not expand into a Pacific equivalent of NATO.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Without an American naval challenge or arms-limitation conference, Japan modernizes steadily and can support British commitments beyond Asia.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Restrictions on ports and fissile material combine with crewing, maintenance, and disposal requirements to complicate nuclear merchant shipping.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
About four remembered archival examples prompt a distinction between an entertaining personal account and a sufficiently corroborated historical claim.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Britain's move to 13.5-inch battlecruisers and the different strategic positions of the Dominions undermine a proposal for six more Indefatigables.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Stuart monarchy in revolutionary America could relieve Hanoverian Britain while importing Jacobite and religious tensions into the new state.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A century without the historical world wars is difficult to predict, but wartime demand would no longer accelerate mass production of products such as penicillin.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Retaining the Gulf commitment requires sustained air and naval forces, while its affordability depends partly on the scale of Britain's existing bases and procurement programmes.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Beresford combined tactical and political ability with a belief that British technological restraint could discourage foreign naval innovation.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
B-29s available to the Allies at the start of 1941 threaten Axis oil, alter fighter requirements, and give Britain the aircraft before the United States joins the war.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Soviet imports could replace some lost Romanian oil, but attacks on transport, storage, and synthetic-fuel plants would make the broader supply network vulnerable.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
With the supporting launchers and facilities supplied, the Royal Navy would use Type 93 torpedoes while objecting to their fuzes.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The game's fictional Gibraltar cruisers introduce powerful gun batteries, radar, and anti-aircraft weapons into Britain's opening Second World War campaigns.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The proposed advantage lies in damaging Bismarck's fire control early, though the participants disagree about a lone cruiser's prospects.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Finding raiders by radar could release ships for convoy protection, Hood's refit and earlier interception off Norway.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Removing construction bottlenecks pushes Britain toward exceptionally large standard designs backed by wartime stockpiles of raw material.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A successful 5.25-inch gun available from 1925 allows broad adoption during the 1930s, including three-twin-mount destroyers.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Issuing modern night vision in 1914 transforms the confused night phase at Jutland by letting British ships track the German fleet's movements.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Losing Pearl Harbor's command and officers would require time to rebuild and assemble American forces before a counterattack.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Phalanx or Goalkeeper gives Type 42s and Type 22s a final defense against isolated Exocets and low-flying bombers.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
In the fictional outbreak, the carrier's isolation and endurance make it useful as a command node only if access is tightly quarantined.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Working Italian radar would strengthen the case for better British naval strike aircraft and more urgent Barracuda development.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
One explanation for Japan's surrender combines the atomic bombings and Soviet entry with the political defeat of hardliners inside Japan.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
One interpretation connects the Bengal famine to neglected railways, disrupted coastal shipping, corruption and failures of British administration.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Britain would examine a lightly damaged Musashi, then probably scrap her unless a museum secured her preservation.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The size of proposed STOVL fighters was one obstacle because operating them could require a new carrier generation.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Even if Axis bombing makes Malta temporarily unusable, the Royal Navy continues from Gibraltar and Alexandria until other campaigns restore the island.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Short-takeoff carrier drones could replace Merlin in airborne early warning and add long-range sensor deployment without an immediate CATOBAR conversion.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A speculative hull insert adds generation and hangar capacity for a full CATOBAR conversion, with major work deferred to a much later refit.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The catapult proposal leaves energy storage undecided, with batteries potentially supplementing the carrier's generators and capacitors offered as an alternative.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Devoting up to two percent of Canadian GDP to the navy from 1902 produces substantial cruiser, destroyer, and sloop forces on both coasts.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Pave Spike in 1961 would strengthen the case for the Buccaneer, but the proposed early installation encounters power and engine limits.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A British-Japanese coalition moves Japanese naval power into the Mediterranean and leaves Germany and Russia unable to contest it at sea.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Short-takeoff drones complement the current F-35B air group, while choosing CATOBAR for drones creates pressure for a full conversion.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
US and allied navies are judged capable of restoring passage, though the operation would be difficult.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Completed Malta-class carriers would be refitted like the Midways and make later British retreat to small Invincible-class decks much less attractive.
From Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·