Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
A MiG-29K air group could support a smaller replacement carrier, while a competing forecast expects prestige to push the hull toward 55,000 to 60,000 tons.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A report that only part of the F-35 fleet is immediately available must be read against normal maintenance and readiness cycles rather than treated as proof that the force is unusable.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British newspapers once maintained dedicated naval and defense staffs, while smaller modern newsrooms push generalists to rewrite wire copy under severe time pressure.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A personal recollection of conflicting Lockheed Martin briefings shows the difficulty of separating F-35 national variants and development proposals from operational configurations.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A hypothetical late-1970s order for eight British SSGNs raises a choice between a Resolution-derived missile carrier and a stretched attack submarine with a smaller magazine.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An SSGN concentrates enough cruise missiles for a sudden major conventional strike, giving a medium-sized navy another way to contribute to NATO deterrence.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Missile mass mattered alongside coordination: Soviet submarines and aircraft needed attacks from several directions, while the necessary communications exposed boats before launch.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Oscar-class missile submarines are dangerous in firing position, but reactor noise and the decline of Russian attack-boat numbers make it difficult to escort them there.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Disappointment with Lada and its planned successor leaves improved Kilos as the practical way to replace Russia's lost diesel-submarine capacity.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Retaining the planned submarine force at Singapore could have placed Japanese invasion routes inside overlapping T-class patrol areas.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Larger naval drones can combine several carrier-support missions, but the required equipment and performance move them far beyond the cost of small expendable aircraft.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Small single-purpose drones create new aircraft categories, but each design can still grow as extra sensors increase weight and power demand.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Working control systems let older drones teach transferable skills while absorbing the collisions common in early operator training.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Hypersonic missiles offer Zumwalt a rapid long-range strike role that uses its low detectability, electrical capacity and space for large launch tubes.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Zumwalt largely delivered the unusual hull that was ordered before the class was cut, while LCS carried speed and drivetrain choices that undermined its intended missions.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A question about medicinal Tokaji use leads to a caution about alcohol: feeling less cold can coincide with greater vulnerability to hypothermia.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British torpedoes were not a drop-in replacement for the Mark 14, but local engineers could probably have adapted them if operational necessity overrode bureaucracy.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A possible Kuznetsov replacement draws different displacement estimates, with STOBAR retained chiefly for its fleet-air-defence role.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Strategic leadership failures can be more damaging than shipboard mistakes, with CSS Arkansas and the Mark 14 torpedo controversy offered as examples.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A suggested Beatty-MacArthur analogy exposes disagreement over tactical judgment, strategic command and administrative achievement.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
CVA-01 would be too constrained for the F-14, while upgraded Phantoms and a British successor to Buccaneer better match the likely timetable.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Human underwater breathing would reduce submarine crew-volume needs and enable new raids, but engines, batteries, currents, cold, and waterproof equipment would remain hard limits.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A modern battleship gun would retain familiar physical constraints, while its turret could use much more automation and different arrangements of barrels.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Higher gun fire volume could support fragment barrages and several shore targets while reducing expenditure from finite missile magazines.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Separate mounts provide independent targeting; the counterargument favors twin guns within each mount to keep at least one barrel available.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Regular interwar maintenance left many British and American hulls sound enough for machinery work without a complete structural rebuilding.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Plans for new machinery, triple eight-inch turrets, and 27-knot speed could not overcome the cost and age of hulls that would still face newer treaty cruisers.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A 15,000-ton cruiser limit might preserve the Tennessees, but it would also permit stronger new rivals and leave Versailles-limited German ships behind.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The July 2025 comparison judges CV90 capable but poorly matched to the age, troop-capacity and armament requirements sought in a Bradley replacement.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Without the fleet at Pearl Harbor, Japan would probably shift attention toward the Philippines rather than attempt an unsustainable mass-carrier raid on San Diego, while the long-telegraphed fleet concentration helps explain Japanese planning.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An English expedition in the Low Countries becomes an example of how inadequate finance could delay campaigning and entangle the royal family in borrowing.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A proposed British 850 psi plant would keep boilers, turbines and generators close together to limit difficult pipe runs and permit maintenance on individual units.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A diesel response to advanced British steam machinery faces a distinction between long endurance and the power density needed for high speed.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
British forces were already being shifted from Europe toward the Pacific and would have joined the planned invasion of Japan.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A surviving Singapore base could have supported a more integrated Anglo-American Pacific war, while its loss split British effort toward the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Aube's interruption of French capital-ship construction and Turner's handling of warnings before Pearl Harbor prompt sharply critical nominations.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Project 23900 debate separates a Russian amphibious shortfall from doubts about offensive use, fleet allocation, and completion of the ships.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A fictional force needs stable capabilities and a recognizable organization, while its tactics and composition should still adapt to the conflict and terrain.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A fictional Byzantine campaign illustrates the error of transferring the same army organization and cavalry tactics into different terrain.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
High-pressure plants would make sense for new fleet destroyers, cruisers, carriers, and capital ships, but not for every escort and older conversion.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Fletcher power plant could be fitted in theory, but modest speed gains would not compensate for redesign and an isolated American spare-parts chain.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A nuclear-powered, 50,000-60,000-ton STOBAR carrier is one forecast for Russia, based on domestic propulsion capability and the attraction of a prestige asset.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A small heavy-bomber force is proposed as part of Britain's naval and air contribution to NATO, with doubts over B-21 access and RAF funding.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The proposed maritime emphasis depends on suitable weapons while preserving a heavy bomber's wider role.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The B-21 comparison centers on affordability, production in quantity, and applying lessons from the difficult-to-sustain B-2.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A limited British work share could benefit domestic industry, but the participants disagree about what France would demand in return.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
French interest is an assumption required by the proposal; Japan is suggested as another possible partner for a bomber with maritime-strike capability.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
B-52 is expected to outlast B-1 and B-2, while a long B-21 transition feeds the argument for buying an established aircraft later.
From Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·