An unlimited-budget Royal Navy weapons fit
An unlimited-budget proposal combines a heavily armed Type 83 precursor with cruise-missile submarines and funding for advanced guns.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Complete directory
Browse all time notes.
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Funding AGS or Japanese railgun development
The unlimited-budget discussion puts a rough cost on making AGS work and then considers railgun cooperation with Japan.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A truthful Warhammer interview and the problem of perspective
A fictional interview becomes a discussion of cross-examination, competing perspectives, and strategic accountability.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why interview the Emperor when his reasoning seems known?
The reply values cross-examination even where a familiar account already exists.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Kryptman and the decision to abandon a forge world
The loss of an industrial world raises questions about defensive priorities and the withdrawal of supporting forces.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Would a truthful Emperor still give a usable account?
The imagined interview distinguishes truthful testimony from the ability to give a reliable account.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Ships to add beyond the Royal Navy pipeline
Competing proposals emphasize amphibious ships and SSGNs, larger missile cruisers, or a third carrier to improve availability.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Dreadnought missile inserts and a five-deck fleet
The proposal combines adaptable conventional-missile magazines with enough aviation ships to sustain two available flight decks.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A modern British cruiser based on Kirov's mission
The suggested British nuclear cruiser borrows Kirov's presence mission and scale while calling for a modern design.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why an A-6 cannot be judged apart from its air wing
The A-6's vulnerability depends on fighter cover, early warning, electronic support, and the distance from which a strike can launch.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Should an interceptor attack the Intruder or its Tomcat escort?
Target priority favors the bomber, while a disputed suggestion considers whether the escort's prestige could distract its attacker.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Navies lose aircraft carriers and the doctrine behind them
Removing carriers and the knowledge behind them leaves gaps in reconnaissance, fighter defense, anti-submarine patrol, strike, spotting, and fleet command.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Can seaplanes fill the gaps left by vanished carriers?
Retaining floatplanes and tenders leaves a doctrinal problem if the knowledge of why carriers existed has also disappeared.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Blackburn Blackburn and airborne plotting space
Observer space and a plotting chart illustrate a command function within early carrier aviation.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why American frigate gun calibres differed before Perry
A short answer relates frigate gun calibre to contemporary development and design feasibility.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why the US Navy repeatedly changed the commodore rank
The changing use of commodore prompts a comparison with Britain's arrangements for altering rank titles.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An anecdote about ministers renaming naval ranks
Wilson and Blair are named, with the third example forgotten and the proposed renaming recounted as an anecdote.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Arabic origin of admiral
The discussion explains admiral through an Arabic expression and compares a Dutch rank title.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why a museum battleship cannot sail immediately
Fueling and sequential boiler startup lead to an estimate of roughly ten days to get underway, with combat readiness unresolved.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
USS Wasp learns British carrier defense with Force H
Wasp's continued Mediterranean service changes doctrine more than outcomes, forcing her air group into continuous fighter and anti-submarine patrols alongside British carriers.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Near-perfect infantry accuracy before Operation Dynamo
Near-perfect rifle, machine-gun, mortar, and antitank fire could stop the German advance even though Allied command problems would delay a counteroffensive.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Which infantry weapons receive 99 percent accuracy at Dunkirk?
The follow-up limits the imagined accuracy to visible targets within range and weapons small enough for infantry to carry and operate.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
GUPPY refits as a bridge to postwar submarines
GUPPY refits keep wartime boats useful while industry develops a more mature postwar generation.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Where to explore Dominican maritime archaeology
La Caleta's underwater park and Santo Domingo's royal dockyard museum pair diveable wrecks with artifacts displayed on land.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why Japan funds more escorts than Britain
Japan treats protection of national sea lines as a direct force-planning requirement, while Britain has repeatedly assigned much of the same burden to alliances.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Naval weapons that almost reached the sea
The proposals include explosive drones controlled from Swordfish, improved torpedoes, rockets against small craft, and radar input to timed fuze setting.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Swordfish guides an explosive drone before its own attack
A proposed Queen Bee derivative gives a Swordfish crew an initial remotely controlled attack before delivering its own weapon.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Could bombardment rockets threaten small warships?
An explicitly anecdotal report of Soviet rocket fire against small craft prompts a wider question about naval rocket artillery.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Radar range sent directly to the fuze setter
A direct radar-to-setter connection improves timed bursts without depending on proximity-fuzed ammunition.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A STOL loyal wingman for Queen Elizabeth-class carriers
A short-takeoff-and-landing variant is the option under consideration at the time of the discussion.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Converting Courageous and Glorious along Eagle's lines
An Eagle-style conversion brings taller hangars and islands earlier, potentially reshaping later British carrier standards more than the ships themselves.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why early nuclear submarines were strategic before they were tactically superior
The first SSNs gain enormous endurance and mobility but remain noisy immature systems facing highly developed diesel-electric boats.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Could proximity fuzes save Force Z?
A marginal improvement in antiaircraft lethality might be decisive because the attacking torpedo force was small and operating near its fuel limit.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Italian carriers force an Allied Mediterranean buildup
Italian carriers alter Allied planning before the war, accelerate British and French carrier construction, and give the Regia Marina useful reconnaissance and fighter defense even with modest aircraft.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Who controls an Italian carrier's air group at sea?
Where aircraft land and obtain support becomes central to the dispute over naval control of an embarked air group.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Could limited Italian carrier fighters still defend a fleet?
Italian engine limitations are debated against the value of reconnaissance and disciplined defensive interception.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
How Fulmars engage an escorted air attack
The explanation follows a Fulmar from an altitude advantage through a formation-breaking dive and a climb for another pass.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
How layered air defense disrupts a pilot's final attack
Fighters, gunfire, and ship maneuver can force missed attacks by disrupting formations and overloading pilots.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Dogger Bank draws Britain and Germany into war
A failed diplomatic response could bring British, German, and Japanese power against Russia and risk an early general European war.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Henderson challenges the wartime construction pause
Henderson is expected to make a stronger case for urgently needed carriers and cruisers, even if he loses the capital-ship argument.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Canada funds rather than crews three Queen Elizabeths
The more plausible imperial contribution is Canadian financing for Royal Navy ships, following the examples of New Zealand and Malaya.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why China would not sell Liaoning to Russia
The proposed sale is judged unlikely while China is expanding its carrier fleet.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Admiral Duncan takes four hundred destroyers to the Pacific
Even obsolete destroyers become a formidable screen when hundreds concentrate their guns and hulls around vulnerable capital ships.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Catapult Hurricanes defend Force Z
Catapult Hurricanes are expected to disrupt the attack, with the bomber-armament claim qualified during the answer.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Why British Type 42s lacked antiship missiles
The answer attributes the differing British and Argentine missile fits to procurement spending.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Three approaches to a 1919 British station cruiser
Competing proposals compare a 15,000-ton 9.2-inch armoured cruiser, a lengthened Hawkins, and several faster 9.2-inch layouts.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Could triple 9.2-inch turrets be ready for a 1919 cruiser?
The proposed mounting is tested against industrial experience and the lead time before a 1919 commissioning.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A 1919 cruiser's secondary guns and destroyer development
The 4.7-inch secondary battery is chosen with the Royal Navy's destroyer armament in mind.
From Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·