Related time notes
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far24:05Why Mark 41 lowers launcher-integration riskNotable Point
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far44:49Mature weapons keep lasers and railguns off the critical pathNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?8:30Fisher's revolutions relied on conservative technologyNotable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?22:04The 15-inch gun and the three-change ruleChapter
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?42:09Why not build the maximal fast battleship?Notable Point
- What went wrong with the Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships?1:02:07Risk aversion and national survivalNotable Point
- Kuznetsov Class Aircraft Carriers: Smoking the Mazut31:43How Type 23 upgrades de-risk Type 26 technologyNotable Point
- What changes if Helicopters are at their third generation in 1939?1:22:26Procurement risk explains the missed helicopter revolutionChapter
- Ship Shape & Running on Gas31:14How the Coast Guard de-risked U.S. Navy gas turbinesNotable Point
- Bruships 100: Science Fiction & Some Fvourites3:34:35Limiting simultaneous technology changes in capital shipsNotable Point
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:10:24Why navies pursue old and new technologies togetherQ&A
- Bruships 69: The Decider54:28Staging new technology in Ford-class carriersQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:44:14When old ships stop being worth keepingQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:49:46Zumwalt, LCS, and the risk of technology leapsNotable Point