Related time notes
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:20:30Fast battleships weaken the case for battlecruiser successorsNotable Point
- What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?25:56Battlecruiser orders could preserve the battleship programmeNotable Point
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...6:03:09The strategic logic of Fisher's Baltic projectQ&A
- The Furious Age: The First Aircraft Carriers12:15Furious resists a neat battlecruiser labelNotable Point
- The Furious Age: The First Aircraft Carriers21:21Harwich Force offered a practical Baltic alternativeNotable Point
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time14:11Large light cruisers and Incomparable were not Royal Navy endpointsQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:30:53The Royal Navy's least successful wartime ship designsQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:28:57An enemy Italy keeps British battleship construction aliveQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy22:30Where Fisher's large light cruisers fitQ&A
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:26:24A true Courageous-class light cruiser would carry 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- Marathon(1888) Class: 19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 40:00How cruiser classifications changed around the Marathon classChapter
- Bruships 78: Favourite Cruisers A Discussion...3:48:30A 9.2-inch cruiser on the Furious hullQ&A
- Duke of Edinburgh Class: Year of Crusier (Long Patrol)36:50First Cruiser Squadron and Gordon MooreChapter
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 1: Introduction23:34HMS Furious turns a large light cruiser into an early carrierChapter
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy7:29Where the large light cruisers fitQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A30:15Courageous was officially a large light cruiserQ&A