Related time notes
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:13:42Repairing North Korea's damaged new destroyerQ&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership56:22Why a Tachibana-class escort could not safely chase much more speedQ&A
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...1:48:53Why early Ticonderogas could not cheaply receive VLSQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy55:50Why Renown could absorb major reconstructionQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:21:21Reconstruction cannot ignore hull structureChapter
- Building A British Super Battleship!25:56Barbette width links guns, protection, and hull strengthQ&A
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak32:05Why Bismarck could not simply take 18-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:30:50What keeping HMS Hood until 1982 would really requireQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:37:55Why South Atlantic service wears ships outQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books1:52:55Why detachable warship hulls struggle in salt waterQ&A