Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Q&A · 1:48:53-1:49:51

Why early Ticonderogas could not cheaply receive VLS

Replacing twin-arm launchers with Mark 41 cells would require structural changes so extensive that a new ship becomes the better investment.

Hull StructureNaval ProcurementShip ModernisationTiconderoga Class CruisersVertical Launch Systems
Watch at this timeFull video guide
Question

Why were the Mark 26-equipped Ticonderoga-class cruisers not converted to the Mark 41 VLS fit used by later ships?

Short answer

Their hull framing was not designed for the VLS modules, and rebuilding that structure would cost so much that constructing a new warship made more sense.

Notes

The first Ticonderoga-class cruisers were framed around Mark 26 twin-arm launchers and their magazines rather than deep vertical-launch modules. Installing Mark 41 VLS would therefore require more than swapping equipment on deck: the supporting hull structure would need substantial redesign and reconstruction. Once a refit reaches the point of reframing a large part of the ship, time and cost approach those of new construction while leaving the navy with an older hull. Replacement becomes the practical procurement choice.