Related time notes
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…1:10:00What an early naval-treaty escalator clause changesQ&A
- The Soviet Man of Steel wants Bigs Ships: Stalin joins the Naval Treaties!34:48The London treaty's existing fault linesChapter
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London33:42Why accept tonnage limits at all?Q&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books3:49:41How one navy leaving the treaty system affects everyoneQ&A
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane49:02Why an indirectly bound navy might observe treaty limitsQ&A
- Stalins Dream Fleets & the Potential Responses25:24A Soviet buildup as a trigger for naval rearmamentNotable Point
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"3:04:49Why the escalator clause rose to 45,000 tonsQ&A
- Modern Frigates: Cruisers by another name? (Patreon 57 Videos Comment Response)27:20Why naval treaties need politically usable escape mechanismsQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 1 - where did they come from24:19The 8,000-ton ceiling reshaped light cruiser designChapter
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 1 - where did they come from35:21Churchill presses the government on the escalator clauseQ&A
- Counter Piracy in China in 1920s & 1930s: Long Patrol Part 315:36How the 1936 naval treaty's safeguard clauses workedChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 5 of 5/Articles 17-2236:38Why the 1936 treaty offered little restraintNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:55:48Could a minor navy trigger the treaty escalator clause?Q&A