Related time notes
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:35How a gun-heavy cruiser might fare in CongressQ&A
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:54:24Escaping the Arleigh Burke procurement benchmarkNotable Point
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:43Why prevention earns little procurement creditNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:20:24Shipyard geography in the panel's procurement argumentNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…8:56:01HMS Churchill as a submarine-program compromiseNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?36:11Capability recovery takes longer than the political headlineNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?55:05Long budget plans can fail when government funding changesNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 12:08:29A second carrier base on MerseysideNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 12:10:50Using ship names to protect a carrier programNotable Point
- Third Rate Ships of the Line: Ubiquity, Ubiquity, o' the Ubiquity!1:35How procurement politics changed warship labelsNotable Point
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:35:41Political limits on common European systemsQ&A
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)4:00:18How ship names and constituencies protect Type 26 ordersNotable Point