Related time notes
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:17:34How an eight-arm fictional megafloat might survive damageQ&A
- USN Destroyers Fletcher to Gearings3:00Machinery subdivision buys time for damage controlNotable Point
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...restart18:17Armor thickness versus compartmentation in Halo warshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 239: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...restart23:52Vanguard, treaty limits, and the meaning of fast battleshipNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust3:33:45What six AGM-65 Mavericks could do to a warshipQ&A
- Glynn Stewart & Alex Discuss How Do You Create a Science Fiction Fleet? #2Historians ep 310:06Compartmentalized threat data shapes bridge decisionsNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:18Why 11-inch guns did not make Scharnhorst a battlecruiserNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...44:07When more armour can make a shell more destructiveNotable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:00:09How G3 and N3 divided their machinery spacesNotable Point
- Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?1:42:26How can machinery spaces survive underwater damage?Q&A
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)52:03Nelson's compartmentalization made alternative tradeoffs visibleNotable Point
- Some More Battle Cruisers8:21Battlecruiser subdivision trades survivability for speedNotable Point
- Bruships 38: Amphibious Operations & Equipment2:04:26Distributed military networks limit breach impactNotable Point
- HMS Arethusa (1934) an introduction to the Arethusa Class part 1/410:13Why the Arethusa class was valued for survival and close watersNotable Point