Q&A · 1:05:15-1:07:08

Why stripped-down frigates are poor fishery-protection ships

A question about retaining Type 23s for fisheries protection leads to a comparison of high-end-frigate running costs with OPVs and Border Force cutters.

Question

Could stripped-down Type 23 frigates be retained for fisheries protection?

Short answer

No. They would cost far more to run than cutters or offshore patrol vessels, while the Navy needs its escorts for higher-priority roles.

Notes

Even a reduced Type 23 would be an expensive answer to a constabulary mission. Border Force cutters and River-class offshore patrol vessels can cover the task more cheaply, while the Royal Navy's small escort force is needed for overseas and warfighting duties. Much domestic constabulary funding sits with the Home Office and Border Force rather than the Navy. Additional OPVs would offer a cheaper way to expand fisheries protection and provide useful junior-command training. Removing equipment does not remove the cost of operating a complex frigate hull and crew.