Q&A · 2:47:50-2:48:21

How carrier victory changes US air-service politics

The most visible air-power success belongs to a navy, making independent-air-force arguments harder to sustain in Washington.

Question

Would the US Army air arm gain more independence and aircraft production in the 1920s?

Short answer

It would still seek more power, but a successful naval air campaign and the possible absence of an independent RAF would strengthen the Navy's political resistance to a separate US air service.

Notes

The scenario expects Army aviators to continue seeking greater institutional independence and aircraft production. Its change is the precedent available in the debate: the celebrated air-power success belongs to a naval carrier force. Britain's unified RAF might also fail to form in the earlier peace. Those assumptions underpin the proposed stronger position for naval aviation in American service politics.