Why is the Dynavert a poor ASW aircraft?

If the CL-84 Dynavert is large enough for ASW equipment, why not use it as the carrier's anti-submarine aircraft?

Its rotor arrangement makes prolonged hovering for dipping sonar inefficient, while adopting it for AEW still adds a separate training, maintenance, and logistics system.

A Dynavert-derived aircraft could physically carry useful equipment. Sustained hovering with a dipping sonar would be fuel-intensive for its tilt-wing arrangement and contemporary technology. Airborne early warning is a better fit because it benefits from altitude without demanding the same hover profile. A cabin sized for twelve passengers offers space for operator consoles, and the empty rear cabin limits the amount of redesign needed. Electrical supply for the radar remains an open question. Adoption would also require another pilot, maintainer, parts, and support system. A converted Sea King is consequently the more affordable and politically plausible choice in this scenario.