Technical development differed by field, so Japan, Britain, and the United States each held advantages in particular areas. Early Japanese radar work is used as an example: one organization developed it as a navigational aid, abandoned it, and another service later pursued it separately. Refusal to share information could interrupt development despite the availability of scientific expertise. Japan also had mass-production capacity before and during the war, although its production priorities are criticized. The distinction concerns how institutions developed and applied technology, alongside their ability to invent it.
Notable Point · 2:25:47-2:29:12
Japanese radar and the cost of service rivalry
Early radar work illustrates how interservice secrecy could interrupt technological development despite existing scientific expertise.