Q&A · 1:59:36-2:00:34

Why deck-edge lifts were not adopted immediately

A design question compares the operating flexibility of deck-edge lifts with the cost, strength, and protection advantages of centerline lifts.

Question

Why did navies take so long to adopt deck-edge aircraft lifts?

Short answer

Earlier centerline lifts were cheaper, strong, and compatible with armored hangars, while deck-edge lifts became more useful as aircraft size increased.

Notes

Centerline lifts were cheaper and structurally simpler at earlier technology levels. They were also quicker to build and inherently stable, which mattered on smaller carriers. In the British case they fitted an armoured hangar whose protected sides were part of the ship's defensive scheme. Deck-edge openings therefore traded some established structural and protective advantages for greater operating flexibility. Their later adoption reflects changing aircraft and ship requirements rather than an obvious solution that earlier designers simply overlooked.