Would building escorts instead of large carriers produce a healthier continuous shipbuilding industry?
Short answerBritain benefits from carrier power projection, but it should pair carriers with continuous escort, submarine, auxiliary, and specialist-ship construction rather than boom-and-bust procurement.
NotesA carrier with fifth-generation aircraft gives Britain a larger voice in coalition operations than contributing escorts alone. That advantage should sit within a broader industrial plan rather than a boom-and-bust program. Continuous production lines for submarines and escorts could run alongside a regular flow of carriers, amphibious ships, auxiliaries, hospital ships, and other specialist vessels. With an escort fleet of roughly twenty-four to thirty ships and service lives measured in decades, about one new escort each year could sustain a production line while specialist construction kept another yard active. The strategic benefit of the carrier and the industrial benefit of steady smaller-ship work are presented as complementary requirements.