Q&A · 1:35:48-1:36:31

Why no A-140 design solves Japan's yard limits

The A-140 alternatives were designed around infrastructure Japan planned to build, so choosing another paper design would not remove the underlying construction bottleneck.

Question

Which rejected A-140 design would have been a better choice than the Yamato class?

Short answer

None, because the entire design family depended on shipbuilding infrastructure Japan did not actually build.

Notes

No A-140 alternative offers a practical improvement on the ships Japan actually built. The designs assumed yards and supporting infrastructure that Japan planned to create rather than what it already possessed. Similar infrastructure had been promised to make the Yamato program more practical, but it was not delivered at the required scale. Japan could barely construct the historical ships, so selecting a different paper arrangement would not cure the industrial mismatch.