Related time notes
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:42:21Initial versus full operating capability at seaQ&A
- Commodore Michael Clapp & the 1982 Falklands War; #2Historians 2025 starts off21:19Fleet Air Arm observers as operational thinkersNotable Point
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:01Judging PLAN readiness as a developing warfighting fleetQ&A
- The Seafire Doctrine Saga: How the RN's fighter control system came to be...0:00Using undeveloped systems in counterfactual analysisNotable Point
- The Seafire Doctrine Saga: How the RN's fighter control system came to be...35:51Wartime availability reshapes doctrineNotable Point
- The Seafire Doctrine Saga: How the RN's fighter control system came to be...38:13Could the ideal interceptor have been a poison chalice?Notable Point
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:55:23Why American equipment is not automatically right for every allyNotable Point
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built3:24:34Why a capable dive bomber could still be obsolete in KoreaQ&A
- Naval Aviation in 1914: It's Standing Before War Began50:22Buying aircraft is not building a capabilityNotable Point
- New Ironsides: KSS1 S8 Comment Response12:01Different naval institutions reaching the same answerNotable Point
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:27:06Why the Royal Navy underestimated dive-bombingQ&A
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 1 (Introduction - Shannon)55:42Unproven weapons depend on the enemy behaving as expectedNotable Point
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 328:35How contemporary battle reports shaped warship designQ&A