Topic

Akizuki Class Destroyers (1942)

Also searchable as Akizuki Class Destroyers.

Related time notes

  1. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    25:12Type 98 guns and the cost of an Akizuki redesignChapter
  2. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    27:57Akizuki orders and the gap between plans and completionsChapter
  3. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    28:27Akizuki's weapons and radar for task-group screeningNotable Point
  4. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    29:57Akizuki construction times varied sharplyNotable Point
  5. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    37:50Super-destroyer proposals and the cost of late ambitionChapter
  6. Japanese Destroyers of WWII: Quantity is a Quality of it's own, it can also be a Decisive one
    40:45A counterfactual 1938 shift to 100 mm destroyersChapter
  7. Bruships 236: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:00:05Fen Yang after Japanese disarmamentQ&A
  8. Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:06:55The Soviet reaction to Akizuki-class war prizesQ&A
  9. Operation Deadlight(not Deadbeat)... scuttling U-Boats(Live)
    2:15:35Akizuki and Fletcher destroyers: design and numbersQ&A
  10. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    3:10:59Why Akizuki is a strong all-round Japanese destroyerQ&A
  11. Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:16:42Choosing the Axis destroyer best suited to its theaterQ&A
  12. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    3:26:21Unfinished Japanese destroyers were poor foundations for postwar escortsQ&A
  13. My Royal Navy Washington Treaty Cruiser: with added Qs from "1939 Destroyer Doctrine" (Long Patrol)
    45:52Akizuki development versus Fletcher evolutionQ&A