Q&A · 2:24:24-2:25:17

Why America converts only one Lexington hull

In 1922 the carrier remains an experimental type, while Congress and the navy already understand the intended role of the funded Lexington battlecruisers.

Question

Why would the United States not sacrifice more Lexington-class hulls for aircraft carriers?

Short answer

Carrier value was still theoretical in 1922, whereas the Lexingtons were already funded and matched the navy's established scouting doctrine.

Notes

The choice must be judged from the start of the treaty era rather than from later wartime experience. American officers knew how fast scouts were supposed to support the standard battle fleet. Carrier doctrine was still being tested, with Britain further along than the other powers. One conversion supplies an experimental aviation platform without abandoning most of a programme Congress had already paid for.