A survivorless Titanic disaster changes evidence and regulation

How would events change if Titanic sank so rapidly after striking the iceberg that there were no survivors?

The loss would be more traumatic and mysterious, while regulation might move faster toward more lifeboats and stronger hull-protection measures.

Without survivors, investigators would lose eyewitness testimony and depend heavily on any surviving wireless report that mentioned the iceberg. The catastrophe would probably drive even more forceful safety changes, potentially including faster growth in lifeboat provision and interest in double-hull arrangements. The evidence available after a loss shapes both the investigation and the technical response.