Q&A · 2:28:08-2:28:52

Accelerating naval technology from ironclads to dreadnoughts

Why late nineteenth-century navies could not expect their newest ships to remain current for as long as earlier sailing fleets did.

Question

Did navies expect ironclads and pre-dreadnoughts to remain in service for as long as sailing warships?

Short answer

Not really; the pace of technological change was already accelerating so rapidly that long-term relevance was much less certain.

Notes

The ironclad period marks the beginning of an accelerating technological curve. Steam machinery, armour, naval guns, and hull construction were all changing at once. A newly commissioned ship could therefore be overtaken by a different combination of technologies far sooner than an earlier sailing warship. Navies understood that long physical survival did not guarantee continued front-line relevance. Their recurring effort to slow the cycle through standardization or incremental modernization could not remove the underlying pace of change. This is why the ironclad and pre-dreadnought eras produced so many short-lived design stages on the way to Dreadnought.