Q&A · 1:37:30-1:38:40

Small warships as command and presence assets

Replacing Royal Navy patrol work with a separate coast guard could save little while reducing junior-command experience and still requiring a warship presence.

Question

Would a British coast guard taking Caribbean and patrol duties be a useful substitute for Royal Navy small ships?

Short answer

Not necessarily: it could reduce junior-command experience, duplicate costs, and still leave situations that require a warship.

Notes

Small vessels give junior officers meaningful command opportunities at manageable risk and cost. Damage to a River-class patrol ship is cheaper to absorb than damage to a Type 45 destroyer. A separate coast guard would still leave places such as the Falklands needing a grey-hulled naval presence, which could duplicate spending rather than replace it. Routine patrol ships develop personnel while meeting operational commitments.