Q&A · 3:12:20-3:13:39

Why carrier numbers mattered alongside carrier size

For interwar carrier planning, multiple smaller hulls could cover more tasks than one large fleet carrier.

Question

Without treaty limits, was it better in the interwar period to invest in multiple small carriers or one fleet carrier?

Short answer

Multiple smaller carriers offered more hulls for dispersed commitments, though an ideal program would combine them with a limited number of larger fleet carriers.

Notes

The answer favors several smaller carriers when the alternative is a single large hull, especially for navies with worldwide commitments. Its hypothetical treaty structure combines a limited tonnage of 30,000-ton fleet carriers with a separate allowance for 15,000-ton light carriers. The result balances large-deck capability with enough hulls to cover dispersed operational demands.