The Sherman comparison values replaceability and modularity that allowed maintenance in the field. Maximum armour and firepower were different objectives from supplying large numbers of supportable tanks. Germany's increasing emphasis on superior individual vehicles is contrasted with continuing to upgrade and mass-produce the Panzer IV. The familiar five-Shermans-for-one-Tiger claim is challenged by the importance placed on firing first and damaging an opponent. The same criticism is applied to promises that Zumwalt or Constellation will perform every mission, which create pressure to keep adding equipment.
Notable Point · 46:06-48:34
Sherman supportability and the tradeoff with numbers
Sherman supportability and the Panzer IV alternative illustrate the tradeoff between individual performance and numbers, then return to modern all-mission requirements.